Romance Is Back.
- Ina Silva

- 8 hours ago
- 3 min read

There's a shift happening in fashion, and it doesn't announce itself with a press release.
Romance is back. But not the kind that telegraphs itself from across a room. Not the Bridgerton cosplay or the coquette cottagecore we scrolled past a few years back. This romance knows better. It's darker, softer, more deliberate. It's lace tucked under a leather jacket. It's a silk mousseline suit so sheer you can see skin through five layers. It's the kind of thing you feel before you see.
At Chanel's Spring 2026 couture show, Matthieu Blazy opened with what looked like a memory of the house's iconic suit, rendered in translucent silk so fine it barely existed. The Grand Palais was filled with pastel mushrooms and the collection read like a haiku, stripped to essential dimensions. No sketches. No reference images. Just clothes made directly on the body, held to earth only by chains and pearls sewn into hems. The whole thing felt like an antidote to the noise, to the constant wow factor we've been conditioned to expect from couture. Blazy himself said it: "Without the wow, it felt better."
That feels right for where we are now.
Because romance in 2026 isn't about more. It's about feeling. The runways are full of it. Lace isn't precious anymore, it's pragmatic; showing up as trim on scarves, layered into tights, woven into everyday pieces that don't require an occasion.
At Copenhagen Fashion Week, designers like Caro Editions and The Garment made the case for lace as something you'd wear on a Tuesday. Stirrup lace tights with leather jackets. Mantilla style handkerchiefs tied around necks. Intimacy, not fragility.
Meanwhile, the pirate aesthetic is having its moment at Dior, Khaite, and Chloé ruffles and vintage lace styled in monochrome palettes that feel more 2026 than Pirates of the Caribbean. There's a literary quality to all of it. Pinterest is calling it "poetcore" and "vamp romance," fueled partly by the upcoming Wuthering Heights adaptation, partly by our collective exhaustion with algorithmic sameness. We're romanticizing the analog again. Fountain pens. Leather saddle bags. The kind of accessories that suggest you might have written something by hand recently.
The color palette tells the story too. Blush pink and peach sit next to deep plums and gothic blacks. Fire engine reds meet buttery neutrals. It's optimistic but grounded, emotional without being performative.
And then there are the textures. Velvet. Silk. See through fabrications paired with structured tailoring. The whole mood is about contrast layering: romantic pieces grounded by something tougher, something that keeps you from floating away entirely. A lace cami under a blazer. A slip dress with chunky boots. Softness meeting edge in a way that doesn't feel calculated, just lived in.
What's different this time is the restraint. Romance isn't screaming for attention. It's choosing intimacy over performance, subtraction over addition.
After years of quiet luxury and beige minimalism, the pendulum has swung but not into maximalism. Into something more honest. More textured. More willing to admit that beauty doesn't always need to be easy or obvious.
There's a reason this resonates now. We're tired. Tired of performing. Tired of optimizing. Tired of the algorithmic churn that makes every day feel identical to the last. Romance, when it's done right, is the opposite of that. It asks you to slow down. To notice. To feel something instead of just consuming it.
So yes, romance is back in fashion. But it's not asking for your approval. It's already decided.




Comments